Now that everyone has a camera I feel better. At least now, one needs not remember an event at all so long has one has pictures to verify the event's existence. Are memories stored in your head or in a photo album in the cellar? I feel that people have an abject and rather desperate need to collect memories. Who hasn't encountered the old timer at the local pub recounting war stories, love stories - how romantic to have lived such a life! But hang on, couldn't I just collect such a life with my camera, snap by snap, each one a further memory of a full life.
The question is: Is a picture the same as a memory? Is a photo of Big Ben the same as seeing Big Ben? Is it the same as smelling
With the advent of digital, there has been a flagrant looseness in the use of cameras by the world. In
In the Louvre, I stood in the room with the Mona Lisa. Crowds of people (more than a hundred) scramble in front of it. I stand at the back, peering for a glimpse of its greatness. There is a cacophonous clicking sound and like gunfire it falls upon the painting. The continuous strobe of flashes was enough to induce a seizure. And for what? A piece of Leonardo? A piece of his fame? No, I am being melodramatic. All those people wanted was a memory of having experienced Great Art, something they can tell their grandkids about some day.
1 comment:
We live in the age of indivudualism, the result of which is our disconnectedness from others.We are lonely creatures with a lingering doubt of our own existance.The camera is our witness. It testifies to our having lived, travelled and possibly loved.It is the legacy we can construct of how we intended to be rather than what we became.
Post a Comment